lomllili1
lomllili1 lomllili1
  • 22-06-2017
  • History
contestada

How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?

Respuesta :

hernandezchanel
hernandezchanel hernandezchanel
  • 22-06-2017
It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.
Answer Link
holesstanham
holesstanham holesstanham
  • 05-07-2019

One of the most important reasons why a historian might benefit from a secondary source when studying a particular event is because the use of a secondary source allows the historian to avoid the need to look back at the primary source. This is because an expert has already studied it, and published it, so that other historians can rely on it. In this way, a lot of money and effort can be saved.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

The purpose of the judicial branch is to
According to the Declaration of Independence, which situation justifies open rebellion against a government
If y=-12 when x=9, find y when x=-4
After the Treaty of Paris, England was not friendly with the United States. a. True b. False
which of the following events damaged public support for the labor union movement during the late 19th century
7.632 in Word from go math
Write this riddle so it's easily understood the middle 3/5 of SHOWS, the first 1/3 of DOODLES, the first 3/5 of YOURS, the first 1/2 of KEEPSAKE, the middle 1/5
Human cells have 46 chromosomes. Each chromosome consists of a pair of identical chromatids attached together by a structure called a centromere. Once the chrom
If y=-12 when x=9, find y when x=-4
What is the gcf of 32 and 48