lornab1069 lornab1069
  • 21-11-2017
  • Business
contestada

Discussions of value claims are generally less emotionally laden than discussions of classification claims.

Respuesta :

meerkat18
meerkat18 meerkat18
  • 03-12-2017

I think the statement is false. Value claims are based on tastes and morals or what is good and bad while classification claims are based on facts or definitions or the existence of something. An argument on value claims would be more emotional since this would dwell on a person’s perspectives about a matter while arguments on classification claims would simply be proving which side is telling the factual answer.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

A 100 LB bag of animal feed is 40% oats. How many pounds of oats must be added to this feed to produce a mixture which is 50% oats?
12 is 4% of what number?
how much has Kenya's fertility rate changed in the last 20 years?
How did the rise of labor unions shape relations among workers, big business, and government?
a box of uncooked spaghetti cost $0.1369 per ounce. how much is this cost to the nearest cent?
Is Macbeth a tragedy of fate or of character? In determining your position on this, consider whether the witches play a central or collateral role in shifting t
Find the common factor and factor out 9ab^2-3abc
If the equation of a circle is (x + 5)2 + (y - 7)2 = 36, its radius is a 6 b 16 c 36
Do houses use parallels or series circuits
Which of the following is a true statement of diffusion? A.) Diffusion is only important for animal cells. B.)Diffusion require energy input from the cell. C.)